Talk:California Department of Transportation/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about California Department of Transportation. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on California Department of Transportation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110629070931/http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/tsip/hseb/products/Named_Freeways.pdf to http://dot.ca.gov/hq/tsip/hseb/products/Named_Freeways.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:50, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
NPOV warning
This article reads like a Caltrans brochure. Caltrans has been extensively criticized, and this article makes it sound like an unequivocal success. The only phrase which even comes close to criticism is "stubbornly idiosyncratic", and this comes paired with praise for being "innovative". -Juansmith 20:18, 31 July 2006 (UTC)
It didn't strike me that way. The second sentence after the one quoted from above has some criticism, and subsequent sentences point out not only "firsts", but "lasts"... not typical of a brochure. Perhaps the author of the preceding comment has a specific criticism in mind. Jim 04:50, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
Maybe the only problem is 'stubbornly'. The paragraph goes on to give examples of both innovativeness and idiosyncraticness. What is subjective is whether that idiosyncraticness is in fact 'stubborn'75.8.224.113 09:29, 21 August 2006 (UTC)
- Unless somebody formulates some concrete contradictions to what's in the article page right now, I don't think the POV tag is justified. --Frescard 04:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)